<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Children, transfusions and religious rights: Wading back into the debate</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thecourt.ca/2008/02/25/children-transfusions-and-religious-rights-wading-back-into-the-debate/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thecourt.ca/2008/02/25/children-transfusions-and-religious-rights-wading-back-into-the-debate/</link>
	<description>The Court is the online resource for data and debate about the Supreme Court of Canada.</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 09:19:26 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Edward</title>
		<link>http://www.thecourt.ca/2008/02/25/children-transfusions-and-religious-rights-wading-back-into-the-debate/comment-page-1/#comment-161614</link>
		<dc:creator>Edward</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 16:53:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thecourt.ca/2008/02/26/children-transfusions-and-religious-rights-wading-back-into-the-debate/#comment-161614</guid>
		<description>Its funny and ironic, if you think about it. Order a court demanded blood transfusion and possibly save a child's life. Then the child grows up and takes you to court. How about being thankful that these doctors saved a child's life and saved a son or daughter?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Its funny and ironic, if you think about it. Order a court demanded blood transfusion and possibly save a child&#8217;s life. Then the child grows up and takes you to court. How about being thankful that these doctors saved a child&#8217;s life and saved a son or daughter?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Colleen</title>
		<link>http://www.thecourt.ca/2008/02/25/children-transfusions-and-religious-rights-wading-back-into-the-debate/comment-page-1/#comment-72718</link>
		<dc:creator>Colleen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2008 16:48:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thecourt.ca/2008/02/26/children-transfusions-and-religious-rights-wading-back-into-the-debate/#comment-72718</guid>
		<description>It's important to notice that the second paragraph of this article states "Ed. note: Bethany Hughes ultimately received several court-ordered transfusions. She died in spite of these."  So would having obeyed or at least taken into consideration her religious wishes, have saved her?  We'll never know, but this case is interesting because she was clearly of sound mind and mature enough to make her own decisions according to the Charter of Rights and Freedoms, and yet her Rights were completely dismissed.  Why should any of our decisions be overlooked and made for us by someone else, just because they are part of the Government, we are all just human afterall, no one person is greater than another.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s important to notice that the second paragraph of this article states &#8220;Ed. note: Bethany Hughes ultimately received several court-ordered transfusions. She died in spite of these.&#8221;  So would having obeyed or at least taken into consideration her religious wishes, have saved her?  We&#8217;ll never know, but this case is interesting because she was clearly of sound mind and mature enough to make her own decisions according to the Charter of Rights and Freedoms, and yet her Rights were completely dismissed.  Why should any of our decisions be overlooked and made for us by someone else, just because they are part of the Government, we are all just human afterall, no one person is greater than another.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
