<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Quebec v. Nguyen: access to education in English, institutional completeness and the constitutionality of a sentence of the Charter of the French language, R.S.Q. c. C-11</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thecourt.ca/2008/05/06/quebec-v-nguyen-access-to-education-in-english-institutional-completeness-and-the-constitutionality-of-a-sentence-of-the-charter-of-the-french-language-rsq-c-c-11/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thecourt.ca/2008/05/06/quebec-v-nguyen-access-to-education-in-english-institutional-completeness-and-the-constitutionality-of-a-sentence-of-the-charter-of-the-french-language-rsq-c-c-11/</link>
	<description>The Court is the online resource for data and debate about the Supreme Court of Canada.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 22:34:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: francine</title>
		<link>http://www.thecourt.ca/2008/05/06/quebec-v-nguyen-access-to-education-in-english-institutional-completeness-and-the-constitutionality-of-a-sentence-of-the-charter-of-the-french-language-rsq-c-c-11/comment-page-1/#comment-150972</link>
		<dc:creator>francine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Aug 2009 08:32:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thecourt.ca/2008/05/06/quebec-v-nguyen-access-to-education-in-english-institutional-completeness-and-the-constitutionality-of-a-sentence-of-the-charter-of-the-french-language-rsq-c-c-11/#comment-150972</guid>
		<description>Parents do want a choice and I am one of those parents. The right to choose the language of instruction of my son is denied based solely on his birth as a French Canadian. It is a discriminatory practice, which places barriers to his future, holding him in involuntary servitude to the province of Quebec’s sensationalized English threat for the preservation of French and manipulated for their Nationalistic endeavor. Parents have the best interest of their children’s educational needs to consider for their future employability, in an era of global connectedness and rapid change. To deny our children just and favorable access to education of choice, will not protect our children’s future against unemployment in a province determined to preserve the French Language, at the expense of individual rights and freedoms afforded to Canadian citizens. There is a negative impact of these coercive measures to the peak potential of our children. The denial of their fair equitable access to the pursuit education of choice is nothing for Quebec to be proud of, as a distinct quality of their cultural heritage to deny their own children a future of free will. The endless delays to deal with this case hurts our children. My son&#039;s entire school years are being confined, negated &amp; educational opportunities denied in a country that considers itself a democracy. It is wrong!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Parents do want a choice and I am one of those parents. The right to choose the language of instruction of my son is denied based solely on his birth as a French Canadian. It is a discriminatory practice, which places barriers to his future, holding him in involuntary servitude to the province of Quebec’s sensationalized English threat for the preservation of French and manipulated for their Nationalistic endeavor. Parents have the best interest of their children’s educational needs to consider for their future employability, in an era of global connectedness and rapid change. To deny our children just and favorable access to education of choice, will not protect our children’s future against unemployment in a province determined to preserve the French Language, at the expense of individual rights and freedoms afforded to Canadian citizens. There is a negative impact of these coercive measures to the peak potential of our children. The denial of their fair equitable access to the pursuit education of choice is nothing for Quebec to be proud of, as a distinct quality of their cultural heritage to deny their own children a future of free will. The endless delays to deal with this case hurts our children. My son&#8217;s entire school years are being confined, negated &amp; educational opportunities denied in a country that considers itself a democracy. It is wrong!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: francine</title>
		<link>http://www.thecourt.ca/2008/05/06/quebec-v-nguyen-access-to-education-in-english-institutional-completeness-and-the-constitutionality-of-a-sentence-of-the-charter-of-the-french-language-rsq-c-c-11/comment-page-1/#comment-150970</link>
		<dc:creator>francine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Aug 2009 08:16:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thecourt.ca/2008/05/06/quebec-v-nguyen-access-to-education-in-english-institutional-completeness-and-the-constitutionality-of-a-sentence-of-the-charter-of-the-french-language-rsq-c-c-11/#comment-150970</guid>
		<description>Ministre de l&#039;Éducation, du Loisir et du Sport, et al. v. Hong Ha Nguyen, et al.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ministre de l&#8217;Éducation, du Loisir et du Sport, et al. v. Hong Ha Nguyen, et al.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

