<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Amici Curiae: Cooper Redux, No Loving in Louisana and Judge Not Edition</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thecourt.ca/2009/10/16/amici-curiae-cooper-redux-no-loving-in-louisana-and-erotic-torts-edition/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thecourt.ca/2009/10/16/amici-curiae-cooper-redux-no-loving-in-louisana-and-erotic-torts-edition/</link>
	<description>The Court is the online resource for data and debate about the Supreme Court of Canada.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 22:34:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: John G</title>
		<link>http://www.thecourt.ca/2009/10/16/amici-curiae-cooper-redux-no-loving-in-louisana-and-erotic-torts-edition/comment-page-1/#comment-159094</link>
		<dc:creator>John G</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 23:31:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thecourt.ca/?p=2480#comment-159094</guid>
		<description>I fear that The Court (the blog, not the judicial institution) has descended into scurrilous language, at least according to the Ontario Public Service&#039;s Internet filter, which denied me access to this page at the office - even resisting the efforts of a security person to lift the block.

I guess using the words &#039;erotic&#039; and &#039;loving&#039; in the URL suggested more excitement than we public servants are entitled to at work.

Well, imagine that I hurried home to turn the Family Filter off and see what there was to read.  More law! More policy! Maybe if I were a golfer, the Florida story would have appealed.

Fortunately law and policy are real turn-ons for me, so I expect to have a great weekend, thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I fear that The Court (the blog, not the judicial institution) has descended into scurrilous language, at least according to the Ontario Public Service&#8217;s Internet filter, which denied me access to this page at the office &#8211; even resisting the efforts of a security person to lift the block.</p>
<p>I guess using the words &#8216;erotic&#8217; and &#8216;loving&#8217; in the URL suggested more excitement than we public servants are entitled to at work.</p>
<p>Well, imagine that I hurried home to turn the Family Filter off and see what there was to read.  More law! More policy! Maybe if I were a golfer, the Florida story would have appealed.</p>
<p>Fortunately law and policy are real turn-ons for me, so I expect to have a great weekend, thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

