THE COURT is the online resource for debate & data about the Supreme Court of Canada.*

BULLETIN: SCC Releases Decisions in R v DC, R v Mabior

This morning, the Supreme Court of Canada released the highly anticipated decisions in the cases of R v DC and R v Mabior. The release of these decisions clarifies the “significant risk of bodily harm” standard first set out in R v Cuerrier.

Thecourt.ca has followed these cases extensively: the facts of the two cases and commentary can be found here and here.

The crux of the decisions is this: Mabior clarifies that the Cuerrier standard of “significant risk of bodily harm” “should be read as requiring disclosure of HIV status if there is a realistic possibility of transmission of HIV”.

A “realistic possibility” of HIV transmission will be negated if:  (i) the accused’s viral load at the time of sexual relations was low and (ii) condom protection was used.

If these two elements are present, one’s failure to disclose their HIV status will not constitute fraud vitiating consent under section 265(3)(c) of the Criminal Code.

Watch out for more detailed commentary on these decisions very soon!

 

 

[filed: List of cases]

Leave a Response


Responses are moderated (see our response policy) and so may not appear on this site for 24 to 48 hours.


XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>