THE COURT is the online resource for debate & data about the Supreme Court of Canada.*

Archive For Entries On Administrative law

30 Seconds to Mars the SCC

iTunes, Amazon.com, Puretracks.com, Rogers Music Store, Sympatico Music Store. For those music lovers who legally download music, these various websites are but a few examples of online sources for mp3 and AAC downloads. As part of the digital consumer experience and convenience of online shopping, previews of songs are provided: 30 second clips that allow [...]

Sibling rivalry sorted by the SCC; gives the go-ahead for McArthur’s last job in Canada (Attorney General) v. McArthur

Over the holidays, in a series of concurrently released decisions, the Supreme Court of Canada considered how a citizen could sue the Crown to financially recover on a wrong committed by an administrative decision maker. The question before the Court was whether one may bring the action directly, or did the lawfulness of the Crown’s [...]

Land Of the Free? SCC Rules that Refugee Status Is Not Immunity From Extradition But Won’t Send Jószef and Jószefne Németh Homebound Just Yet (Németh v. Canada)

What do you do when a foreign state knocks on your door requesting the extradition of individuals facing criminal charges back home? If Karlheinz Schreiber comes to mind, then your answer might be, “No sweat, send him packing.” But the fact that Jószef Németh and his wife, Jószefne Németh, were Roma refugees living in Canada [...]

Power and Pride: Fishing for a Compromise between Rio Tinto Alcan & the Carrier Sekani (Rio Tinto Alcan Inc. and British Columbia Hydro and Power Authority v. Carrier Sekani Tribal Council)

The assertion of Crown sovereignty is a question that has never been resolved in Canadian constitutional jurisprudence. The mindset of original settlers was that Aboriginal peoples did not count as inhabitants of the land, so discovery applied in order to assert sovereignty. As Canada moves to an era of equality of all peoples, ignoring a [...]

Public Inquest Into Death of Michel Berniquez Finally Given Green Light: Leave to Appeal Denied for Bellemare c. Lisio

The Supreme Court of Canada has denied leave to appeal from the Quebec appellate decision of Bellemare c. Lisio, 2010 QCCA 859 (French only), ending the well-publicized legal battle over the fate of a public inquest into the death of Michel Berniquez. Nearly eight years have passed since the night Mr. Berniquez died from cardiac [...]

Tranchemontagne — An Unclear Standard for Statutory Challenges

On September 16, the Court of Appeal for Ontario delivered its reasons in Ontario (Disability Support Program) v. Tranchemontagne, 2010 ONCA 593. The appellate decision is the latest event in an ongoing legal battle — the case was previously litigated all the way to the Supreme Court of Canada to determine if the tribunal had [...]

Bankrupting the Family Class: The Future of Sponsorship Debt

In December of this year, the Supreme Court of Canada will hear the Attorney General of Canada and the Attorney General of Ontario appeal the Ontario Court of Appeal (OCA) decision, Mavi v. Canada (Attorney General), 2009 ONCA 794 [Mavi]. At issue in the OCA decision was how the government should behave when enforcing promises, [...]

Tranchemontagne — Statutory Challenges to Statutory Enactments: What is the Appropriate Standard?

The Tranchemontagne series of cases have received some previous attention on this site. In this note, however, I want to focus on one of the more significant, if understudied, aspects of the 2009 Ontario Disability Support Program v. Tranchemontagne Ontario Divisional Court decision. [1] In this decision the Court directly addresses a growing trend in [...]

Hinzman v. Canada: Iraq resister wins the battle but not yet the war

The Federal Court of Appeal’s recent judgment in Hinzman v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), 2010 FCA 177 is a decisive, if transitory, victory for American Iraq war resisters seeking refuge in Canada. Transcending the narrow theme of conscientious objection, the decision simultaneously provides authoritative guidance on the standards expected of administrative decision-makers, the [...]

R v. Conway (2010): The SCC Clarifies the Relationship between Charter Remedies and Administrative Tribunals

Last week the SCC released its decision in R. v. Conway, 2010 SCC 22. At issue was whether or not the Ontario Review Board (“ORB”) has the authority to grant remedies under s. 24(1) of the Charter. As noted by the SCC, the “wider issue [was] the relationship between the Charter, its remedial provisions and [...]