Child Pornography, ‘Undue’ Harm, and the Clapham Omnibus: A Case Comment on R. v. Katigbak
November 1st, 2011
In R. v. Katigbak, 2011 SCC 48, the Supreme Court was called on to clarify the nature and scope of the child pornography defence in s.163 of the Criminal Code of Canada, R.S.C., 1985, c. C-46 that existed before and after legislative amendment in 2005. Robert Katigbak was found with 628 images and 30 video [...]



