THE COURT is the online resource for debate & data about the Supreme Court of Canada.*

Archive For Entries On Civil Procedure

Black v. Breeden: The Ontario Court of Appeal Applies New Van Breda Test to Find Conrad Black Victorious

Conrad Black has another court victory under his belt after the ruling in Black v. Breeden, 2010 ONCA 547, where the Ontario Court of Appeal ruled his libel suits against former Hollinger board members can proceed in Ontario.  The defendants argued libel actions brought against them by Black had no connection to Ontario and should [...]

Denial of Leave To Appeal in Linn v. Kovach Confirms Jury Trials May Not Be Split Without Consent of Both Parties

Last week, the SCC did not grant leave to appeal in Linn v. Kovach, 2010 ONCA 126, leaving intact the principle that jury trials may not be split unless both parties consent. The decision is particularly interesting as the amended Ontario Rules of Civil Procedure of January 1, 2010 led to a strong obiter dicta comment. [...]

Muscutt Quintet Test Simplified in Van Breda

Almost eight years ago, the Ontario Court of Appeal set out an eight-factor test in Muscutt v. Courcelles, (2002) 60 O.R. (3d) 20, to determine what circumstances Ontario could take jurisdiction over an out-of-province defendant. The OCA held that there must be a “real and substantial connection” between the dispute and forum for taking jurisdiction [...]

Orly Taitz and the Boundaries of Civil Procedure

Quite possibly the single most entertaining jurisprudential moment of 2009 happened this Tuesday, when Judge Clay Land of the U.S. District Court in the Middle District of Georgia finally lost his judicial temper at the antics of Orly Taitz. Orly Taitz is now infamous for her championing of the “birther” cause, whose adherents believe that [...]

Marcotte, Breslaw and Class Action Justice

Imagine the following scenario: Bob owns a house in a town in Quebec. In 2020, Quebec passes legislation to the effect that no municipality may increase property taxes by more than 10% each year. In 2022, citing the need for higher revenues to account for an increase in police services due to rising crime, the [...]

Interim Costs Orders to be Revisited by Supreme Court in Alberta Language Rights Case

On Wednesday, TheCourt.ca published a student post on the Supreme Court’s decision to grant leave to appeal to R. v. Caron. Today we publish a second piece on Caron, which was intended to be published earlier but a glitch in our process caused a delay. It is important to note that the following comment was [...]

The SCC Grants Leave to Appeal in R. v. Caron

On August 27th, the SCC granted the Alberta government leave to appeal in R. v. Caron, 2009 ABCA 34. Chief Justice McLachlin, Justice Abella and Justice Rothstein granted the leave application without costs and without reasons. Nevertheless, it seems absurd that making an unsafe left turn has turned into a four year long engagement with [...]

The new reality – serving legal documents through Facebook?

Facebook – the quintessential communication portal. Many people spend numerous hours messaging, writing on walls, and taking quizzes on Facebook. But what is the impact of Facebook on our judicial system? Ideas of privacy, admissibility of evidence, and other issues rise up with the advent of a new era of utilizing Facebook as evidence, as [...]

Recognizing No-Fault Civil Liability in Respect of Neighbourhood Disturbances in Québec Civil Law

Dust they are, and unto dust they shall return, yet human beings have difficulty resigning themselves to living in dust. Sometimes, weary of brooms and buckets of water, they are not unwilling to turn to the courts to get rid of it. This case is proof of that. So begins the Supreme Court of Canada’s [...]

Galambos v. Perez: Not Likely to Clarify Our “Mutual Understanding”

On October 23, 2008, the Supreme Court announced that it granted leave to appeal to an unusual B.C. case that, despite a recognized need for refinement, is unlikely to significantly clarify the law of fiduciary duty. Michael Z. Galambos, et al. v. Estela Perez (32586) presents a fact scenario in which the relationship between the [...]