THE COURT is the online resource for debate & data about the Supreme Court of Canada.*

Archive For Entries On Construction of statutes

Reduced Standard of Review Inappropriate: A Case Comment On CHRC v Canada

In Canada (Canadian Human Rights Commission v Canada (Attorney General), 2011 SCC 53, the issue originated in a human rights complaint with the Canadian Human Rights Commission (CHRC), with a claimant alleging that the Canadian Forces had discriminated against her on the ground of sex. The Tribunal awarded damages, and the claimant then applied for [...]

When Tax Avoidance is Abusive: Elucidating the ‘Spirit’ of the Income Tax Act in Copthorne Holdings Ltd. v. Canada

When deciding cases relating to tax planning—or the minimization of a taxpayer’s tax burden—judges face the daunting task of reconciling a tension between longstanding common law principles and s.245 of the Income Tax Act, R.S.C., 1985, c.1,  the General Anti-Avoidance Rule (GAAR). On the one hand, Lord Tomlin’s holding in Duke of Westminster that “every [...]

Whatcott v Saskatchewan (Human Rights Tribunal), 2010 SKCA 26–Pt II: What to do with Whatcott?

Anti-gay demonstrator Bill Whatcott will soon learn what the Supreme Court of Canada has to say about the offensive flyers he dumped on Western Canada in the early 2000s. Whatcott spammed “hundreds of thousands” of Saskatchewanites until four people filed human rights complaints against him, claiming he had violated the Province’s hate laws. He responded [...]

Canadian Human Rights Commission v. Canada (AG): SCC Decision Shapes Dim Reality For Human Rights Complainants

In Canada (Canadian Human Rights Commission) v. Canada (Attorney General), 2011 SCC 53, Ms. Mowat filed a sexual harrassment complaint against her former employer, the Canadian Forces. The Canadian Human Rights Tribunal found that her complaint was partially substantiated and awarded her $4,000 for “suffering in respect of feelings or self respect.” When Ms. Mowat further applied for [...]

But, I Want to Play Too! The Future of WIND Mobile: Public Mobile v AG of Canada Globalive Wireless, Bell Canada, Rogers, Shaw and Telus Communications Companies (Respondents)

A short time ago, in Canada, there were three bungling giants in the telecommunications industry: Bell, Rogers, and Telus. By many accounts, when it came to customer service and satisfaction, each was as bad as the other: they forced customers into non-negotiable and eternal contracts, riddled their bills with unexpected charges, and as a final [...]

Aboriginal Taxation: Does the Indian Act Exempt Interest Income? Find Out Soon in: Alexandre Dubé v. Her Majesty the Queen

The SCC is currently considering the very modern problem of Alexandre Dubé’s capital gains tax woes. As a member of the Obejiwan First Nation (as defined by the Indian Act R.S.C. 1985, c.I-5), living on a reserve in Quebec, many of Mr. Dubé’s sources of income are exempt from federal and provincial taxation schemes. He [...]

Out, Damned Spot! The AG’s office says the evidence is gone – but there’s evidence of wrongdoing all over in Chaudhary v. Attorney General of Canada et al.

Fair is foul, and foul is fair: an overview The latest development in the David and Goliath saga that is The Canadian Government v. Alan N. Young is as intriguing as always, yet also somewhat disheartening. It pits Osgoode’s venerable criminal law professor in his role as Co-Founder/Director of the Innocence Project, an organization that [...]

No More Puppy Love in R. v Huggins, 2010 ONCA 746

The Ontario Court of Appeal has released its judgement in R. v. Huggins, 2010 ONCA 746, a hotly-contended case surrounding a notorious dogfight.  In a decision that will be an extreme disappointment to dog-lovers everywhere, the Court ordered that “Ginger” the pit bull be put down immediately. A Walk in the Park Turns Into a [...]

Public Inquest Into Death of Michel Berniquez Finally Given Green Light: Leave to Appeal Denied for Bellemare c. Lisio

The Supreme Court of Canada has denied leave to appeal from the Quebec appellate decision of Bellemare c. Lisio, 2010 QCCA 859 (French only), ending the well-publicized legal battle over the fate of a public inquest into the death of Michel Berniquez. Nearly eight years have passed since the night Mr. Berniquez died from cardiac [...]

“Letter of the Law” Poised to Undermine Equity in Divorce: A Look Ahead to Schreyer v. Schreyer

This November, the Supreme Court of Canada (“SCC”) will weave in and around federal and provincial legislation that has generated consternation over divorce and property division equity in Canadian provinces. The judges will hear party submissions from the Manitoba Court of Appeal (“MCA”) decision of Schreyer v. Schreyer, 2009 MBCA 84, a judgment that ultimately released [...]