THE COURT is the online resource for debate & data about the Supreme Court of Canada.*

Archive For Entries On Blog Entry

Revisiting Publication Bans: MEH v Williams (2012)

Every tragedy has private dimensions to which the public is not privy. But should it be? In MEH v Williams, 2012 ONCA 35 CanLII, M.E.H. (respondent), the wife of former Col. David Russell Williams of the Canadian Armed Forces, sought a court order sealing the entire record of divorce proceeding she intended to bring against [...]

Delineating the Charter’s Scope in Pridgen v University of Calgary

Section 32 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms limits the Charter’s application to the activities of the Federal government and Parliament, and the government’s of each province. While the purpose of this provision is to clearly limit the scope of the Charter’s application, as in many areas of law, what initially appears to [...]

Momentous.ca v. Can-Am Assn. of Professional Baseball: SCC’s Can-of-Corn Ruling on Attornment Still Leaves Questions Unanswered

The Supreme Court of Canada (SCC) has recently released its decision in Momentous.ca Corp. v. Canadian American Association of Professional Baseball Ltd., 2012 SCC 9 [Momentous.ca], which is only the first in a series of much awaited rulings of the SCC aimed at clarifying the question of jurisdiction Canadian courts have to hear private international [...]

When is a ‘Penalty’ Not ‘Penal’? – Rowan v OSC

Last week, the Ontario Court of Appeal [OCA] released its decision in Rowan v Ontario Securities Commission 2012 ONCA 208  [Rowan]. In Rowan, the chief issue was whether s. 127(9) of the Ontario Securites Act [the Act], which allows the Ontario Securities Commission (OSC) to order administrative monetary penalties [AMPs] of up to $1 million per breach [...]

Amici Curiae: The Prostitution Challenge at the OCA and Trayvon Martin

Prostitution Challenge Passes Muster At OCA After months of deliberation, the Ontario Court of Appeal issued a landmark ruling on Monday regarding prostitution laws in Canada. While prostitution itself was not illegal in Canada, up until Monday, several provisions regarding prostitution were. This decision recognizes the rights of sex workers in allowing them the ability [...]

R. v. Ipeelee: Correction, Conviction and Culture

R. v. Ipeelee [2012 SCC 13] is a difficult case. As with most criminal cases, the facts of the case are difficult to stomach: a dizzying confluence of alcohol and drugs and then bursts of violence, particularly against women. Raised without parental guidance in an abusive home, the two defendants, both of whom are of [...]

The Need for Deference: Assessing Preliminary Administrative Decisions Post-Dunsmuir – Halifax (Regional Municipality) v. Nova Scotia (Human Rights Commission), 2012 SCC 10

Last week, the Supreme Court of Canada (SCC) released its decision in Halifax (Regional Municipality) v. Nova Scotia (Human Rights Commission) (“Halifax“), 2012 SCC 10. Writing for a unanimous Court, Justice Cromwell held that the decision by the Nova Scotia Human Rights Commission to send a complaint to a board of inquiry for determination was [...]

At the Court: The Homicide Common Sense Inference and Online Bullying

When it Comes to Homicide, What’s Common? The Supreme Court of Canada will have the opportunity to revisit the charges laid of Adrian John Walle, a developmentally delayed Calgarian (cf. R v Walle, 2010 ABCA 384) on April 13. The Court will decide whether the Alberta Court of Appeal was correct in applying the “common [...]

Amici Curiae: Graham James Sentence, Coerced Adoptions, and the OCA’s Upcoming Decision on Prostitution Laws

Graham James Sentence Inspires Timely Debate on Sentencing The highly publicized sentencing of Graham James, a former junior hockey coach convicted of sexually assaulting two players that he coached as teenagers, including former NHLer Theo Fleury, has drawn strong reactions from commentators and victims and inspired timely debate regarding sentencing practices in Canada. James was [...]

Credulous Consumers and ‘Strange Collections of Affirmations and Restrictions’: A Case Comment on Richard v. Time Inc.

Generally speaking, advertisers are in the business of making promises. Occasionally, it falls on courts to determine when businesses will be held to the promises they make, even if they had no intention of keeping them. In Leonard v. PepsiCo Inc., 88 F Supp 2d 116, a favourite of first year contracts students, the US [...]