THE COURT is the online resource for debate & data about the Supreme Court of Canada.*

Archive For Entries On Freedom of Expression

SCC Continues to Navigate the Tension Between Labour Relations and Privacy in Bernard v Canada

Last November, the Supreme Court of Canada decided that Alberta’s Personal Information Protection Act, SA 2003 c P-6.5, which, inter alia, had the effect of preventing unions from filming individuals crossing a picket line, was an unjustifiable violation of the constitutional right to freedom of expression (for more, see the commentary by Avnish Nanda and Brock […]

Appeal Watch: Religiosity in Government to be Deliberated by SCC in MLQ v. City of Saguenay

Over the past couple of decades, there have been calls to remove God from Canada’s national anthem, ban the wearing of religious symbols by public servants in Quebec, and abolish the recitation of the Lord’s Prayer during town council meetings in Ontario. The Bouchard-Taylor Commission on reasonable accommodation in Quebec recommended that municipal councils abandon […]

Rob Ford’s Trial by Media and the Innocents Caught in the Undertow

These days, the pen (or, perhaps, the keyboard) is truly mightier than the sword. Pens shape public perception, and that power endures beyond borders and beyond lifetimes in our digital age of information. But as the adage goes, with great power comes great responsibility. The international media frenzy surrounding the Rob Ford saga has intensified […]

BULLETIN: SCC Declares Alberta’s Personal Information Protection Act Unconstitutional, Affirms Freedom of Expression in Labour Context

In a unanimous decision, the Supreme Court of Canada in Alberta v United Food and Commercial Workers, Local 401 2013 SCC 62 declares Alberta’s Personal Information Protection Act (PIPA) to be unconstitutional, as it breaches a union’s freedom of expression, protected under s. 2(b) of the Charter of Rights and Freedom, and cannot be justified under s. 1. Despite […]

Citizens United Did Not Equate Money with Speech—But McCutcheon Will

Last Tuesday, the Supreme Court of the United States heard oral arguments in McCutcheon v Federal Election Commission (McCutcheon). At issue are provisions of the Federal Election Campaign Act, 2 USC § 431 (the Act), that impose a biennial limit on individual campaign contributions. This lawsuit—brought by Shaun McCutcheon, a wealthy Alabama businessman and serial […]

Privacy trumps the press: The Supreme Court grants anonymity to victims of cyberbulling in AB v Bragg Communications Inc

We have all seen how Facebook can shine a global light on local events with the help of news media. Posts that attract enough attention are reported, creating an even bigger splash online. This feedback can even amplify the impact of these events, turning a small protest into a revolution and a politician’s indiscretion into […]

Amici Curiae: Three Newsmakers from the US Supreme Court, the Canadian Courts Are A’Tweetin’ and Julian Assange’s Asylum News

Obama 0, US Supreme Court 2: Supreme Court Refuses to Revisit Citizens United Decision For political and legal enthusiasts in the United States, this was a real behemoth of a week. The Supreme Court of the United States started it off with a bang – or, really, three bangs. It released three decisions on Monday, […]

A Valiant Attempt to Fight the Court’s Contempt: R v Gibbons

Linda Gibbons is no stranger to the law, and to the fact that it can be a harsh teacher, given that she has spent a fair amount of time in prison for her anti-abortion picketing activities.  Labeled by the media as “peaceful but relentless,” Gibbons has served a total of nearly nine years behind bars, […]

Expression Trumps Privacy: UFCW v Alberta

The one-two punch of the Quebec government trying to control the student strikes and the Canadian Pacific Railway (CPR) being threatened with back to work legislature have turned Canadian attention to the state of union workers. The rights and privileges of workers when on strike have become a constant stream of headlines. Another controversial union […]

Post, Like, and Share Away: Pridgen v University of Calgary

University students across the country held their breath this week when the Alberta Court of Appeal released its decision in Pridgen v University of Calgary, 2012 ABCA 139.  While on its face, the case decides whether universities are subject to Charter scrutiny, and whether the University’s discretion to impose disciplinary sanctions on theses students was […]