R v Katigbak: Child Pornography, ‘Undue’ Harm, and the Clapham Omnibus
In R v Katigbak, [2011] 3 SCR 326, the Supreme Court of Canada (“SCC”) was called on to clarify the nature and scope of the child pornography defence in s....
In R v Katigbak, [2011] 3 SCR 326, the Supreme Court of Canada (“SCC”) was called on to clarify the nature and scope of the child pornography defence in s....
In Canada (Canadian Human Rights Commission) v Canada (Attorney General), [2011] 3 SCR 471 [Canada v Canada], Ms. Mowat filed a sexual harrassment complaint against her former employer, the Canadian Forces. The...
In September 2005, the Supreme Court of Canada (“SCC”) held that British Columbia’s Tobacco Damages and Health Care Costs Recovery Act, SBC 2000, c 30 [CRA] was constitutional in British Columbia...
In early October the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom [‘UKSC’] was asked to determine whether evidence with an independent life of its own, obtained from an individual without a...